In what way is the science of matter manipulation down to the smallest atom any good without an environment. How can being in a contained environment where only the atoms that are being worked with can be made to do what they can. What about the environment they are meant to live in how can we get atoms that are meant to live in the outside world to adjust to new environments with out a simulation of the world. Couldn’t we just create a simulation of every atom and how it exists in the world and universe. We have pictures and NASA has the satellite that can read matter signatures. We could put these together with the simulation of atoms working in science and find out how to construct the world our environments and other universes and if we have enough data on alternate dimensions then we could simulate those too with a atom by atom representation that we could store in the computer hard drive. It would be a neat endeavor to be able to allow other computer users access to different worlds in space to see how they live or to create different worlds based on their own idea of how physics affect reality. Whole worlds could be created like they did in China where the workings of atoms and their function in society would change the very lives of those people who want to live in the world of their creating computer world simulation programmer. As just a way to make money. Artificial intelligence could also be used to navigate and report activities they could finally see the world as we see it as what ever creature they wish, they could learn to adapt to environments thus helping us adapt to changes we need to account for when visiting other planets. We could do this I know we can.
Energy Concept
Motion creates energy yet the motion is caused by the consumption of energy. To put in energy to cause motion to get energy out. It's a conversion of one energy into another by the medium of motion.
Feeding a machine fuel in the form of wood, oil, nuclear or electricity to get something novel out of it. But where does it lie is this just another case of recognizing our own bodies potential to take food and turn it into energy. Could there be something else or could we add something to what we got like an internal power source like a super conductor.
Is there more were missing? Is power all about the conversion of energy. What if we take the atom floating in space as an example instead of the human body. What might we see? How bout the sharing of energy between close proximity of other atoms. Would an atom eventually fail if you left it in isolation. Doesn't the constant correlation between that spark that brings energy into one atom and converts it into a spark that feeds energy into another atom have anything to do with how we stay within the constant state of reality. Keeping the bonds that tie us together as real as being connected through multi mediums of exchange. Could we create a machine like a collection of atoms teaming swarming about one specific area to create the likes of Gold could we create diamonds by what the proper atmosphere of those teaming atoms that create gold and diamonds do for humanity being able to infuse the likes of different atoms to create on a productive scale not when they run out of resources to work with but to work with the infusion of a constant supply of the resources it needs to create and all in all feeding their own progress with energy to win one goal.
And what about unicollectivism that goes on between atoms to create things within their sphere that gives light to new constellations and galaxies isn't this a display of putting one relationship that can complement another relationship together. Say we built machines this way with ones power going to another's and building in tandem a focus that they would all share win one goal.
Could the collective conscious of machines be made by our ability to see what good we can do by working together. If there is one product that takes a team of people of collective abilities together to create couldn't we create machines that would push out these collective ambitions of what needs to be brought into life. Sure manufacturing but does one machine that uses another directly share in its energy usage does one pass its motion of energy to another machine in order to do its job and then provide once more an example of its power to create to continue to produce and nourish. I think not the power doesn't pass from one link in the chain around back to the other links in the chain they get gobbled up by poorly rationalized equipment that creates products but doesn't create more energy.
