Natural Resources

Natural resources come in two types a renewable resource and a non-renewable resource and a countries wealth is largely dependent the resources it contains. Now if to argue a position of multiplying non-renewable resources so that we aren’t as dependent on them, would take turning a manufacturing process to make synthetic versions of natural resources in three phases; an exact duplicate of natural resources minus any environmental concerns (unless we find uses for the effects and harness the harmful gases), two to make engineered superior synthetic versions of natural resources; thus giving more variety (of producible product from the processes that would come after) more quantity (concentrated) and more powerful (a direct response resulting in more power[work/energy]) extractable materials, and a refined synthetic resource that would hold the exact needs of one of the reliant industries (for in house extracting).
This would become important at a time when engineered substances become more abundant and producible to a wider market years from now when science like high energy physics and super colliders make their way into everyday life. They will need a way to come into the picture and I suggest encouraging companies to take small endeavors with existing commercial use science of synthetics to make any change needed to compensate the same behavior at a different price. I suggest they make the synthetics and design the method to produce the product from the synthetic and then sell the plans for extraction of the product to the companies that have been in business handling the materials in non-renewable resources. I mean it would be a shame to put a company that has been in business since mineral extraction was new out of business because we came up with something better. What kind of attitude is that to support, stick with what you know, do what you love, is my suggestion.
I envision it working something like this. You pick a small town heavily dependent on lets say coal and you make a deal with the coal company you sell our product (limited amount) at these prices so we can continue to grow. Your company will be making cleaner suggestion to your clients and we will be offering you the product to go on selling in your chosen business. Now that the small segment of town is covered for synthetic coal and a supplier the synthetic company buys a warehouse in the county to expand to serve a wider community, now I could say then their state then their region but then we would be offering a monopoly so let say there are more companies that need to get paid then a few and we offer this to the ones, who take interest in this sort of thing and see it as good for their business.
To this through, you must know not what the alternatives are to what’s out there, but is there any synthetic substance that when refined can deliver the same results as the existing material out there. You might want to start with energy but might I suggest one of the companies that came up with steel housing or better than wood housing frames by replacing their material with a better than steel version of synthetic if not to expensive. They came out and wanted to compete its better to have a processed practiced and tried with a few small contractors than to start off with the giants with an idea for something that could work before you ever tried to see if it would work. A lot more goes into than what I said I just basically outlined the rational steps and logical thinking that should decide the benefits. If you want any real guidance on the feasibility of this issue you should discuss this with the guys at material science and let them decide what’s possible if it is. And if you could do me the favor of having the companies show growth in their companies so that you know your efforts to make them a formidable force doesn’t go unmerited.

***The company that gets offered the deal would suggest an alternative to environmentally conscience of clients in his sales pitch. Show price and limited time offer based on quantity.